Search
Adam Back: Bitcoin faces no quantum risk for next 20–40 years
17.11.2025
Adam Back says Bitcoin faces no meaningful quantum threat for at least the next 20–40 years, adding that NIST-approved post-quantum standards can be adopted in time
Adam Back: Bitcoin faces no quantum risk for next 20–40 years
17.11.2025
Adam Back says Bitcoin faces no meaningful quantum threat for at least the next 20–40 years, adding that NIST-approved post-quantum standards can be adopted in time
Adam Back: Bitcoin faces no quantum risk for next 20–40 years
17.11.2025
Adam Back says Bitcoin faces no meaningful quantum threat for at least the next 20–40 years, adding that NIST-approved post-quantum standards can be adopted in time
Adam Back: Bitcoin faces no quantum risk for next 20–40 years
17.11.2025
Adam Back says Bitcoin faces no meaningful quantum threat for at least the next 20–40 years, adding that NIST-approved post-quantum standards can be adopted in time
Adam Back: Bitcoin faces no quantum risk for next 20–40 years
17.11.2025
Adam Back says Bitcoin faces no meaningful quantum threat for at least the next 20–40 years, adding that NIST-approved post-quantum standards can be adopted in time
Adam Back: Bitcoin faces no quantum risk for next 20–40 years
17.11.2025
Adam Back says Bitcoin faces no meaningful quantum threat for at least the next 20–40 years, adding that NIST-approved post-quantum standards can be adopted in time
Adam Back: Bitcoin faces no quantum risk for next 20–40 years
17.11.2025
Adam Back says Bitcoin faces no meaningful quantum threat for at least the next 20–40 years, adding that NIST-approved post-quantum standards can be adopted in time
Adam Back: Bitcoin faces no quantum risk for next 20–40 years
17.11.2025
Adam Back says Bitcoin faces no meaningful quantum threat for at least the next 20–40 years, adding that NIST-approved post-quantum standards can be adopted in time
Adam Back: Bitcoin faces no quantum risk for next 20–40 years
17.11.2025
Adam Back says Bitcoin faces no meaningful quantum threat for at least the next 20–40 years, adding that NIST-approved post-quantum standards can be adopted in time
Adam Back: Bitcoin faces no quantum risk for next 20–40 years
17.11.2025
Adam Back says Bitcoin faces no meaningful quantum threat for at least the next 20–40 years, adding that NIST-approved post-quantum standards can be adopted in time
Adam Back: Bitcoin faces no quantum risk for next 20–40 years
17.11.2025
Adam Back says Bitcoin faces no meaningful quantum threat for at least the next 20–40 years, adding that NIST-approved post-quantum standards can be adopted in time
Adam Back: Bitcoin faces no quantum risk for next 20–40 years
17.11.2025
Adam Back says Bitcoin faces no meaningful quantum threat for at least the next 20–40 years, adding that NIST-approved post-quantum standards can be adopted in time
Adam Back: Bitcoin faces no quantum risk for next 20–40 years
17.11.2025
Adam Back says Bitcoin faces no meaningful quantum threat for at least the next 20–40 years, adding that NIST-approved post-quantum standards can be adopted in time
Adam Back: Bitcoin faces no quantum risk for next 20–40 years
17.11.2025
Adam Back says Bitcoin faces no meaningful quantum threat for at least the next 20–40 years, adding that NIST-approved post-quantum standards can be adopted in time
Adam Back: Bitcoin faces no quantum risk for next 20–40 years
17.11.2025
Adam Back says Bitcoin faces no meaningful quantum threat for at least the next 20–40 years, adding that NIST-approved post-quantum standards can be adopted in time
Adam Back: Bitcoin faces no quantum risk for next 20–40 years
17.11.2025
Adam Back says Bitcoin faces no meaningful quantum threat for at least the next 20–40 years, adding that NIST-approved post-quantum standards can be adopted in time
‘We should migrate now’ to post-quantum encryption, researcher says
11.11.2025
Gianluca Di Bella claimed quantum computing already makes encryption and ZK-proofs vulnerable today due to “harvest now, decrypt later” risks
‘We should migrate now’ to post-quantum encryption, researcher says
11.11.2025
Gianluca Di Bella claimed quantum computing already makes encryption and ZK-proofs vulnerable due to “harvest now, decrypt later” risks
‘We should migrate now’ to post-quantum encryption, researcher says
11.11.2025
Gianluca Di Bella claimed quantum computing already makes encryption and ZK-proofs vulnerable due to “harvest now, decrypt later” risks
‘We should migrate now’ to post-quantum encryption, researcher says
11.11.2025
Gianluca Di Bella claimed quantum computing already makes encryption and ZK-proofs vulnerable due to “harvest now, decrypt later” risks